top of page
Search

Faceless but Not Fearless: When MSMEs Struggle Against GST Demand

In a landmark move, the Telangana High Court recently granted relief to National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC)—a government agency under ISRO—by staying a ₹12+ crore GST demand and allowing a partial 10% deposit, citing the absence of a functional GST Appellate Tribunal.

If a well-funded government agency isn’t in a position to pay or defend itself, it begs a chilling question:

What hope do India’s 6.3 crore MSMEs have?

🔍 The Ground Reality for MSMEs

These are not isolated incidents. They represent a systemic stress test—and MSMEs are failing not by fault, but by design.


🧵 Case 1: The Frozen Account

Name: Aakruti Garments (Ahmedabad)Issue: Received a GST demand of ₹8.4 lakh for an “ITC mismatch” due to vendor’s cancelled registration.

Facts:

  • Had proper invoice, payment record, and goods receipt.

  • Vendor registration was cancelled retrospectively, unknown to them.

  • The department froze their current account.

  • No tribunal to appeal.

  • Their working capital cycle was destroyed—production halted for 3 weeks.

“We paid GST honestly, and now we’re being punished for someone else’s default.”

🧵 Case 2: The Construction Startup That Got Crushed

Name: BuildLine Projects (Hyderabad)

Issue: Received ₹18 lakh GST demand for “wrong classification of service” from SAC 9987 to 9954.

Facts:

  • Filed returns accurately based on previous assessments.

  • Department said they should have classified differently.

  • No prior notice, directly received SCN and order.

  • Appeal possible, but only after 10% payment (₹1.8 lakh).

  • They had less than ₹60,000 in their account.

  • Had to borrow from relatives to avoid default.

“We didn't even get a chance to explain—just one PDF and one demand. That’s it.”

ree

🧵 Case 3: The Tech Consultant Who Gave Up

Name: Zenterra Tech (Bengaluru)

Issue: ₹2.2 lakh demand for “non-matching” GSTR-1 and 3B

Facts:

  • The mismatch was due to a portal glitch where a B2B invoice was auto-populated as B2C.

  • Technical glitch acknowledged in grievance but not resolved.

  • Filed appeal but stuck since no tribunal exists.

  • After 4 months of waiting, and one notice for bank attachment, the founder shut operations and went abroad.

“The business is dead, not because we failed, but because the system failed us.”

🧵 Case 4: The Silent Retailers

Unnamed chain of local Kirana stores (Tier 2 Andhra Pradesh)

Received SCNs for not reflecting turnover from cash-based UPI sales,

even though tax was paid.

No one to fight.

No CA on record. No appeal filed. Notices ignored. Penalty growing.


ree

🧵 Case 5: The Women Entrepreneur’s Loss

EcoWeaves (Delhi NCR) – Handloom e-commerce startupGST

demand: ₹6 lakh for “unmatched 2B vs. GSTR-3B”

→ Founder had just 2 team members.

→ Couldn’t afford to hire a lawyer.

→ Order confirmed by default.

→ She’s now back to freelancing.


ree

😔 These Are Just A Few.

For every visible case, there are hundreds that go unheard:

  • Street vendors paying GST through Amazon or Swiggy but facing mismatch notices

  • Artisans and craft sellers stuck in a maze of portal errors

  • Micro-exporters penalized for LUT mismatches even after refund sanctioned

  • Small service firms whose ITC is rejected because their vendor’s GSTR-1 wasn’t filed on time


Most of them don’t even understand what “Section 16(2)(aa)” means, let alone how to defend themselves against it.


⚖️ Justice Exists, But the Path Is Closed

The writ jurisdiction of High Courts remains the only window—but it’s a window very few MSMEs can reach.

And without the GST Tribunal, the system is operating with its entire appellate mechanism missing.


💡 What Needs to Change?

✅ Set up GST Appellate Tribunal immediately

✅ Offer financial threshold waivers for micro businesses

✅ Set up state-level ombudsman panels for small taxpayer disputes

✅ Defer coercive recovery if appeal is filed and pending

✅ Launch a GST Grievance Redressal App with real-time tracking


📣 Final Words

“Ease of Doing Business” should not be limited to top 100 companies.It should start with those who have no CFO, no legal team, no buffer capital — just trust in the system.

Let’s speak up, document these stories, and push for reform — because silence now will cost us our entrepreneurial future.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page